Distinguishing diamonds of natural and synthetic origin is one of the most important tasks of any gemological laboratory. With the advances in technology and methodology available to manufacturers, a wider variety of synthetic diamonds has begun to emerge. Recently, a client submitted a 1.03 ct emerald-cut synthetic diamond (figure 1) to the Carlsbad laboratory. We determined it had been grown from the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. This was evident from the large silicon-vacancy peak at 737 nm seen in both the UV-visible and photoluminescence spectra of this type IIa synthetic diamond. A lack of tatami strain and the distinctive growth patterns observed in the DiamondView (see W. Wang et al., “Latest-generation CVD-grown synthetic diamonds from Apollo Diamond Inc.” Winter 2007 G&G , pp. 294–312) confirmed the origin (figures 2 and 3).
As the vast majority of CVD synthetic diamonds submitted to the lab weigh less than one carat, this sample was unusual for its size, as well as its color grade of Faint pinkish brown. This is the first colored CVD synthetic diamond examined by GIA that did not merit a “Fancy” modifier, but instead fell in the Faint to Light range. While pink CVD-grown synthetics have been documented, in most cases the color was generated by post-growth treatment. Here the pinkish color seemed solely related to the growth process, with no subsequent treatments (HPHT annealing, irradiation, and then annealing) coming into play.
Troy Ardon is a staff gemologist and diamond color origin specialist, and Sally Eaton-Magaña is a research scientist, at GIA’s laboratory in Carlsbad, California.
Distinguishing diamonds of natural and synthetic origin is one of the most important tasks of any gemological laboratory. With the advances in technology and methodology available to manufacturers, a wider variety of synthetic diamonds has begun to emerge. Recently, a client submitted a 1.03 ct emerald-cut synthetic diamond (figure 1) to the Carlsbad laboratory. We determined it had been grown from the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. This was evident from the large silicon-vacancy peak at 737 nm seen in both the UV-visible and photoluminescence spectra of this type IIa synthetic diamond. A lack of tatami strain and the distinctive growth patterns observed in the DiamondView (see W. Wang et al., “Latest-generation CVD-grown synthetic diamonds from Apollo Diamond Inc.” Winter 2007 G&G , pp. 294–312) confirmed the origin (figures 2 and 3).
As the vast majority of CVD synthetic diamonds submitted to the lab weigh less than one carat, this sample was unusual for its size, as well as its color grade of Faint pinkish brown. This is the first colored CVD synthetic diamond examined by GIA that did not merit a “Fancy” modifier, but instead fell in the Faint to Light range. While pink CVD-grown synthetics have been documented, in most cases the color was generated by post-growth treatment. Here the pinkish color seemed solely related to the growth process, with no subsequent treatments (HPHT annealing, irradiation, and then annealing) coming into play.
Troy Ardon is a staff gemologist and diamond color origin specialist, and Sally Eaton-Magaña is a research scientist, at GIA’s laboratory in Carlsbad, California.